Political Science
How do historical landmarks (monuments, palaces, etc) influence people’s perception of state power in Vilnius?
S
Simonas Davidavicius
·May 3, 2026·16 post.minRead·4 post.views
post.abstract
Statues in parks, palaces left by royal families long ago forgotten, monuments built during the heyday of empire. Each of these is an example of historical landmarks that are found in cities all over the world. They appear as centerpieces to a city's identity, main centers within parks and public spaces, or disappear in the forgotten parts of the city, ever stuck on the cusp of rennovation. With this essay, I aim to analyze and explore how historical landmarks within Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania, influence people's perception of state power.
post.keywordsUrbanism, State Power, Historical landmark, History
post.bibliography
- BIBLIOGRAPHY:
- Boda, Z., Medgyesi, M., Fondeville, N., & Özdemir, E. (with European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions). (2018). Societal change and trust in institutions. Publications Office of the European Union.
- Čepaitienė, R. (2013). Memory politics in a Multiethnic City: The Case of Vilnius.
- Edensor, T. (1997). National Identity and the Politics of Memory: Remembering Bruce and Wallace in Symbolic Space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, (2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1068/d150175
- Moore, I. (2019). Vilnius memoryscape: Razing and raising of monuments, collective memory and national identity. Linguistic Landscape. An International Journal, (3), 248–280. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18022.moo
- Nijakowski, L. M. (2006). Monument Wars and the Pursuit of Symbolic Dominion over a Territory: Analysis Based on the Case of Germans in Poland. International Journal of Sociology, 36(4), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659360402
- Rimaitė, V. (2019). Political monuments in Lithuania: Artistic aesthetics and national identity. Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.18680/hss.2019.0024
- Smith, R. W., & Bugni, V. (2006). Symbolic Interaction Theory and Architecture. Symbolic Interaction, 29(2), 123–155. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2006.29.2.123
- Spicer, C. (2020). Set in stone? Monuments, national identity & Sir John A. Macdonald. Leviathan, 11 (1), 34 - 37
- Thatcher, M. (2018). Introduction: The state and historic buildings: preserving ‘the national past.’ Nations and Nationalism, 24(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12372
Submission Record
RECORDEDSubmission Date2026-05-03 16:30:19 UTC
Document Identifier (SHA-256)
7be8fec8f130bcaf…
Record Status
Recorded
S
Simonas Davidavicius
2 post.followers